Paradigmatical development of accounting: historical analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26642/ppa-2025-1(11)-10-20Keywords:
accounting paradigms, accounting theory, institutional theory, accounting history, methodology of accounting researchAbstract
The research paper offers an advanced exploration of the paradigmatic evolution of accounting, integrating historical, theoretical, and institutional frameworks. Employing Thomas S. Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions, it interrogates the trajectory of accounting paradigms, elucidating their emergence, contestation, and eventual transformation. The analysis critically engages with the contributions of preeminent scholars such as R.J. Chambers, R.R. Sterling, and R.V. Mattessich, positioning their work within the broader discourse of paradigm shifts in accounting theory. This investigation extends beyond theoretical boundaries, illuminating the dialectical relationship between socio-economic forces, institutional responses, and paradigm realignments driven by crises, technological disruptions, and regulatory reforms. The research advances the application of Kuhn’s framework within accounting discourse, advocating for its adaptation to encapsulate the multifaceted socio-institutional dimensions of accounting science. It underscores the inherent pluralism of accounting paradigms and their responsiveness to evolving societal and economic conditions. The research confronts the epistemological and methodological limitations of Kuhn’s model in accounting, calling for a nuanced refinement that aligns with the discipline’s institutional complexities. The findings provide a significant contribution to scholarly discourse, fostering a deeper understanding of the evolution of accounting paradigms and their implications for theoretical and applied practice.
References
Berry, A.J. (1994), «Spanning the boundary: The role of the management accountant in interfirm relationships», Management Accounting Research, Vol. 5 (1), pp. 7–23.
Bila, Yu. (2024), «Genesis of the development of accounting paradigms: a scientific analysis», Herald of Economics, No. 2, pp. 116–130.
Butterworth, J.E., Gibbins, M. and King, R.D. (1982), «Structure of accounting theory: some basic conceptual and methodological issues», reprinted in R.Mattessich (ed.) Modern accounting research: history, survey, and guide, Vancouver, pp. 209–250.
Butterworth, J.E. and Falk, H. (1986), «Financial Accounting – Theory and Application to the Oil and Gas Industry in Canada», Hamilton: The Society of Management Accountants of Canada.
Chambers, R.J. (1975), «Profit Measurement, Capital Maintenance and Service Potential: A Review Article», Abacus, Vol. 1, pp. 97–104.
Cushing, B.E. (1989), «A Kuhnian interpretation of the historical evolution of accounting», The Accounting Historians Journal, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 1–41.
Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013, EUR-Lex, [Online], available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2013/34/oj/eng
Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014, EUR-Lex, [Online], available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32014L0095
Elliott, R.K. (1992), «The Third Wave Breaks on the Shores of Accounting», Accounting Horizons, June, pp. 61–85.
Flamholtz, D. (1979), «The Structure of Scientific Revolutions and its Implications for the Development of Accounting Policy», The Academy of Accounting Historians Working Paper Series, Vol. 2, pp. 124–141.
Glautier, M.W.E. and Underdown, B. (1997), Accounting. Theory and Practice, Pitman Publishing, London, 744 р.
Gouws, D.G. and Rehwinkel, A. (2004), «Financial accounting and reporting: sustaining relevance in the present time paradigm», Meditari Accountancy Research, Vol. 12, No. 1. pp. 77–99.
Håkansson, H. and Lind, J. (2004), «Accounting and network coordination», Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 29 (1), pp. 51–72.
Ijiri, Y. (1982), «Triple-Entry Bookkeeping and Momentum Income», American Accounting Association, pp. 51–53.
Kam, V. (1990), Accounting theory, 2nd edition. 581 p.
King IV report - Corporate Governance, PwC, [Online], available at: https://www.pwc.co.za/en/publications/king4.html
Kuhn, T.S. (1970), The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.), University of Chicago Press, [Online], available at: https://www.lri.fr/~mbl/Stanford/CS477/papers/Kuhn-SSR-2ndEd.pdf
Lev, B. (2000), New Accounting for the New Economy, Stern School of Business, New York, 27 p.
Lev, B. and Gu, F. (2016), The end of accounting and the path forward for investors and managers, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, 260 p.
Mattessich, R. (1995), Critique of Accounting: Examination of the Foundations and Normative Structure of an Applied Science, Quorum Books, London, 284 р.
Nazarova, I. (2023), «Accounting paradigm in application conditions of electronic information technologies», Herald of Economics, No. 2, July, pp. 103–118.
Nowak, W.A. (1998), Rachunkowość Sektora Publicznego. Koncepcje. Metody. Uwarunkowania, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, 241 p.
Pasko, O.V. (2007), Accounting paradigms, Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Conference «Creation of an Intellectual System of the Form for the Economy of Ukraine», Ekonomichna thought, Ternopil, 526 p.
Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2004), Accounting theory, 5th ed., Thompson Learning, 598 p.
Seal, W., Cullen, J., Dunlop, A., Berry, A. and Ahmed, M. (1999), «Enacting a European supply chain: A case study on the role of management accounting», Management Accounting Research, Vol. 10 (3), pp. 303–322.
Shaikan, А.V. (2009), Accounting in management decision-making, KNEU, Kyiv, 303 p.
Shortridge, R.T. and Smith, P.A. (2009), «Understanding the changes in accounting thought», Research in accounting regulation, Vol. 21 (1), pp. 11–18.
Spilnyk, I., Brukhanskyi, R., Struk, N., Kolesnikova, O. and Sokolenko, L. (2022), «Digital accounting: innovative technologies cause a new paradigm», Independent Journal of Management & Production, Vol. 13 (3), pp. 215–224.
Sterling, R.R. (1967), «A statement of basic accounting theory: a review article», Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 95–112.
Szychta, A. (1996), Teoria rachunkowosci Richarda Mattessicha w swietle podstawowyh kierunkow rozwoju nauk rachunkowosci, Fundacja Rozwoju Rachunkowosci w Polsce, Warsawa, 256 p.
The International Framework, The International Integrated Reporting Council, [Online], available at: https://integratedreporting.ifrs.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/13-12-08-THE-INTERNATIONAL-IR-FRAMEWORK-2-1.pdf
Tomkins, C. (2001), «Interdependencies, trust and information in relationships, alliances and networks», Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 26 (2), pp. 161–191.
Tunque-Lizana, M. and Quispe-Huaman, L. (2025), «Aportes de las teorías y paradigmas contables 2018-2024: una revisión sistemática», Gestionar: Revista De Empresa Y Gobierno, Vol. 5 (1), pp. 7–22.
Van der Meer-Kooistra, J. and Vosselman, E.G. (2000), «Management control of interfirm transactional relationships: The case of industrial renovation and maintenance», Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 25 (1), pp. 51–77.
Wells, M.C. (1976), «A Revolution in Accounting Thought?», The Accounting Review, July, pp. 471–482.
Yukhimenko-Nazaruk, I.A. (2017), Development of the theory and methodology of accounting in the context of neo-institutional theory, O.O. Yevenok, Zhytomyr, 300 p.
Zhuk, V.M. (2018), Development of accounting theory: institutional aspect, IAE, Kyiv, 408 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Serhii Lehenchuk, Iryna Zhyhlei, Nataliya Zdyrko, Dmytro Zakharov
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
