Assessment of Waste Treatment in Urbanized Areas in the Environmental Policy Context: National Experience

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26642/ppa-2021-2(4)-3-8

Keywords:

pollution, environmental friendliness indicators, sustainability of cities, urbanized areas, waste generation

Abstract

The environmental challenges of today worsen the life conditions and create threats for a human. An issue of special concern in the environmental security context are urbanized areas characterized by heavy environmental pollution. Analysis of the impact of waste generation and treatment in Ukraine on the environmental performance of urbanized areas and its conformity with the principles for decision-making on setting priorities and strategies on the basis of comparable information has significant importance in elaborating urgent measures for environmental stabilization in urbanized areas.
Principal component analysis was used for estimating the correlations between the factors of pollution in urbanized areas,
their meaningful interpretation and modeling of the complex factor impact. The factors were selected, characterizing the environmental effects, which is waste generation from economic activities of stationary pollution sources in urbanized areas:
burnt waste of all the hazard categories; total accumulated waste per 1 square km; capital investment and current expenses on
treatment of waste of I–III hazard categories; capital investment and current expenses on treatment of waste of IV hazard category; capital investment and current expenses on waste disposal in specially designated places or waste objects of waste
of ІV hazard category; capital investment and current expenses on monitoring and laboratory tests for the objective: waste treatment (except for radioactive waste).
The results of assessment confirmed the impact of these factors on the environmental performance of Ukrainian cities.

References

Borsa, M. (2015), «Spatial policy in Poland 2004–2013», Selected regional and local public policies in Poland – 10 years of EU

membership, Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Warsaw.

Borsa, M., Baczyński, K., Brodowicz, D. еt al. (2016), Ecology Constructively, Collegium Mazovia.

Gavrilidis, A.A., Nita, M.R., Onose, D.A. еt al. (2019), «Methodological framework for urban sprawl control through sustainable planning of urban green infrastructure», Ecol. Indic., Vol. 96, pp. 67–78, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.10.054.

Lopatynskyi, Y. and Meglei, V. (2018), «Ecological and economic development of agriculture in Ukraine», Economy in Practice and Theory, Vol. 53 (4), pp. 95–109, doi: 10.18778/1429-3730.53.06.

State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2020), Methodological guidelines on compilation of the account of emissions to the ambient air, approved by Decree from 07.09, No. 268, [Online], available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/norm_doc/2020/268/268.pdf

State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2017), Methodological guidelines on formation and dissemination by the State Statistics Service of Ukraine of environmental indicators according to international standards, approved by Decree from 01.12, No. 311, [Online], available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/

State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2020), Methodological guidelines on organization of the official statistical observation on generation and treatment of waste, approved by Decree from 12.08, No. 251, [Online], available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/

Michalina, D., Mederly, P., Diefenbacher, H., and Held, B. (2021), «Sustainable Urban Development: A Review of Urban

Sustainability Indicator Frameworks», Sustainability, Vol. 13, рр. 9348, doi: 10.3390/su13169348.

Mishchenko, V.S., Makovetska, Yu.M., and Omelianenko, T.L. (2013), Institutional development of waste treatment sector in

Ukraine: on the way to the European integration, Institute of Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, 192 р.

Norton, B.A., Coutts, A.M., Livesley, S.J. et al. (2015), «Planning for cooler cities: A framework to prioritise green infrastructure to mitigate high temperatures in urban landscapes», Landsc. Urban Plan., Vol. 134, pp. 127–138,

doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.018.

UN DESA Population Division (2012), World Urbanization Prospects: the 2011 Revision, [Online], available at:

https://population.un.org/wup/

UNISDR (2013), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2013 – From Shared Risk to Shared Value: The Business Case for Disaster Risk Reduction, UNISDR Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland, 246 p.

Wilbanks, T.J. and Kates, R.W. (2010), «Beyond adapting to climate change: embedding adaptation in responses to multiple threats and stresses», Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 100 (4), pp. 719–728, doi: 10.1080/00045608.2010.500200.

Yerina, А.М. (2001), Statistical modelling and forecasting, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, 170 p.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-20

How to Cite

Kobylynska, T., & Motuzka, O. (2021). Assessment of Waste Treatment in Urbanized Areas in the Environmental Policy Context: National Experience. Public Policy and Accounting, (2(4), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.26642/ppa-2021-2(4)-3-8

Issue

Section

Статті